Vegans have been actively campaigning against vivisectors since ~ the 1870s.
Today, here in Hong Kong, we had a table covered in anti-vivisection pamphlets.
The earliest that we were referring to was one by Ernest Bell from 1889.
As we were working, we realized that Google could not find many of our favorite quotes – also many misquotes are available through Search.
So, in this post, we are transcribing approx. 40 powerful quotes from an old BUAV booklet. We are also planning to scan & do OCR on items in our magazine / journal collection – more below.
Example quotation –
Victor Hugo did say – “La vivisection est un crime”.
Victor Hugo poète, écrivain, homme politique “La vivisection est un crime” (discours inaugural du lancement de la ligue anti-vivisectionniste française, 1883)
Victor Hugo poet, writer, politician “Vivisection is a crime” (inaugural address the launch of the anti-vivisection league French, 1883)
Victor Hugo did not say: “Nothing is more powerful than an idea whose time has come.”
“On resiste a l’invasion des armees; on ne resiste pas a l’invasion des idees.” – from the final chapter of Hugo’s book Histoire d’un Crime (“The History of a Crime”), his account of the French coup d’état of 1851 that brought Napoleon III to power.
In reality, the literal English translation of the sentence from Hugo’s Histoire d’un Crime is:
“One can resist the invasion of armies; one cannot resist the invasion of ideas.”
The oft-cited English paraphrased versions were never spoken or written by Hugo.
Here are some powerful anti-vivisection quotes from a 1906 publication – compiled by Dr. Walter R. Hadwen & friends.
It also quotes some sections of Ernest Bell’sAnimals’ Friend journals – more sections of which we are in the process of transcribing.
We wanted to make the quotations fully searchable & add the Wikipedia pages for each of the persons quoted. Some were veg(etari)ans / plant-eaters – others were not. Many of their names appear in multiple sections of our Ernest Bell Library – supporting campaigns of The Humanitarian League – supporting the ‘Ragged School’ movement – working to abolish child-labour – working for prison reform – promoting London’s vegan soup kitchens – founding & running their own anti-vivisection organisations – supporting ‘Band of Mercy’ groups – supporting ‘Band of Hope groups etc., etc.
We were happy to find that every single person had their own Wikipedia page!
The Ernest Bell Library does not have a copy of this booklet – we have taken the content from here. We have not copied the inner covers – the scans were not clear.
Principal Tulloch, in a letter dated 1874, reports the following :- “The Queen then talked very warmly of Vivisection, about which she is greatly excited. It made her wild, she said, to think of the cruelties practised toward poor animals, and she ridiculed the idea of comparing it to sport.”
“If He who made us made all other creatures also, and if they find a place in His providential plan, if His tender mercies reach to them – and this we Christians most certainly believe – then I find it absolutely inconceivable that He should have so arranged the avenues of knowledge that we can attain to truths, which it is His will that we should master, only through the unutterable agonies of beings which trust in us.”
”The cause you have at heart (Anti- Vivisection) is of even greater importance to human character than to the physical comfort of those of our ‘fellow-creatures ‘ who are most immediately concerned.”
“If the knowledge of physiology has been somewhat increased, he surely buys knowledge dear who learns the use of the lacteals at the expense of his own humanity.
“The comedy of high and pure intentions, the scenic effect of the healer doing-violence to his own nature in causing pain that he may cure it, the theatrical mise-en-scene of the arch-benevolence forcing itself to hurt that it may thus acquire power to soothe and save ; these are what, with the greatest care and caution, are put before the world in general by the priesthood of physiology. Nothing can be further from fact. Throughout Europe and America, and in many parts of Asia and Africa the pursuit of physiology is a profession like any other, a career, a means to an end — that end, like other men’s, being money, celebrity and success.”
“To hold that the increase of physical comfort, the removal of physical pain, the prolongation of physical life, are the supreme objects for the sake of which we may demoralise our higher humanity, is simply a worship of the flesh, unworthy of a true man, impossible to a true Christian.”
— Paper read at, the Church Congress at Folkestone, 1892.
“The simultaneous loss from the morals of our ‘advanced’ scientific men of all reverent sentiment towards beings above them as towards beings below is a curious and instructive phenomenon highly signifi- cant of the process which their natures are undergoing at both ends.”
“Many Vivisectors are not medical men at all, and it has not yet become a proverb that physiologists are humane. The general tendency is obvious. . . We are bound to see that the sacred name of Science is not used as a shelter for unworthy practices.” — From “The Effects of Vivisection,”
“I wish evermore the utmost success to all protests against the inhuman practices of Vivisection. It does not bear to be thought of. How it must excite the righteous indignation of the all-merciful Creator.”
“I assert that the practice of vivisection – the torture of living- animals – is immoral. It offends against this law – ‘Treat an inferior being as you would desire your- self to be treated by a superior being.’ “
— Annual Meeting of the Manchester Anti- Vivisection Society, 1896
“It is not at this price of suffering that true knowledge is advanced. Man has no right to be the tyrant because he alone combines strength of mind and body.”
“The higher your motive for it, the greater is the blame of your unrighteous- ness. Must we congratulate you on such a love for your fellows as inspires you to wrong the weaker than they, those who are without helper against you ? It is the old story: the greed of knowing casts out righteousness and mercy and faith. Whatever believed benefit may or may not thus be wrought for higher creatures, the injustice to the lower is nowise affected.”
— “The Hope of the Universe,” – “Sunday Magazine,” November, 1892.
“Depend upon it other avenues of knowledge will be open to you for the discoveries your desire to make. . . . Do your duty to the beast, and depend upon it you will be doing your duty to the man.”
“The day may come when the rest of the animal creation may acquire those rights which never could have been withholden from them but by the hand of tyranny. The question is not ‘can they reason‘ nor can they talk, but can they suffer?”
— “Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation.”
“There can scarcely be imagined any experiments less capable of true scientific success than those of vivisection, though they have been the most frequent. We must not consider our rights (over animals) as absolutely unlimited.”
“These scientific pursuits were now defiantly, provokingly, insultingly separated from the science of religion; they were all carried on in defiance of what had hitherto been held to be compassion and pity, and of the great link which bound together the whole creation from its Maker to the lowest creature.”
“We can never, whatever our future exertions in their behalf may be, make up for the arrears that humanity owes to the lower animals. The brain reels in the effort to represent to itself some faint picture of the amount of physical pain inflicted in every age and every country of the world by man upon his helpless victims, victims of his war, of his peace, of his malignity, of his stupidity, of his pseudo-science, of his vanity, of his gluttony. . . The shadows lengthen. None of us will have much time in which to be kind, therefore, in God’s name, let us begin at once.”
“I would rather submit to the worst of deaths, so far as pain goes, than have a single dog or cat tortured on the pretence of sparing me a twinge or two.”
— From a letter to Miss Cobbe, December 28th, 1874
“After some considerable reflection on the matter, having read much that I would rather not have read, and having thought on the matter so much as I had the power, I have come to the conclusion that control it you cannot, that the evils of another kind are so great and the good it professes to do so doubtful that on the whole – all human affairs being on a balance – it is right and proper that this Bill should pass and that Vivisection should be absolutely prohibited.”
— Speech at the Annual Meeting of the Anti- Vivisection Society, July, 1881.
“When Vivisection shall be practised in every college and school, and when the man of science, looking forth over a world which will then own no other sway than his, shall exult in the thought that he has made of this fair, green earth, if not a heaven for man, at least a hell for animals.”
“Vivisectors always use the arguments that my extreme revolutionary friends employ to justify dynamite explosions. ‘ What does it matter,’ the latter would say, ‘ if we blow to pieces anyone in this room provided we can thereby secure the millenium.'”
— Speech at British Union Annual Meeting, May 15th, 1906
“I have for some years come to the conclusion that nothing but total abolition will meet the case of Vivisection. I am quite disgusted at the frequency of the most horrible experiments to determine the most trivial facts recorded in the publications of scientific societies month by month evidently carried on for the interest of the ‘research’ and the reputation it gives.”
— From a letter to Dr. W. R. Hadwen, September, 1905
“Knowledge is a great object, but it is not the highest of objects. It is surely easy to conceive cases in which it is right to abstain from acquiring knowledge. The practical conclusion that I come to is, that if the distinction can be drawn in practice between what I hold to be lawful and unlawful vivisection, I would allow one and forbid the other. But I see the very great difficulty in drawing the line between the two; and, if it cannot be drawn in practice, especially as it seems so very doubtful whether vivisection has lessened human suffering or not, I can only go in for a complete forbidding of the practice.”